2005-06 UW-Madison Faculty/Staff

Computing Survey

 

 

 

 

 

 

Faculty and Staff Breakdown

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

April 21, 2006

 

written by: Sarah Pluck

contact: spluck@ssc.wisc.edu

University of Wisconsin Survey Center

University of WisconsinMadison

 

 
 

 

 



Backgrounds and Objectives

 

The 2005-06 UW-Madison Faculty/Staff Computing Survey was the latest in DoIT’s annual efforts to gauge IT needs, concerns, and performance on the UW campus. Specific objectives of the survey were to:

 

  • Continue to monitor faculty/staff awareness and use of computing services
  • Obtain respondent perceptions of DoIT’s performance in providing products/services in a competitive environment
  • Record changing information technology behavior
  • Determine relative importance of and preference for new product and service concepts
  • Provide actionable research for training

 

Methodology

 

The 2006 Faculty/Staff Computing Survey used a single-mode strategy with the sample (1,200) receiving the survey via State of Wisconsin Inter-Departmental (campus) mail. The mail survey was mailed to 1,200 randomly selected UW-Madison faculty and staff on January 19, 2006.  A postcard reminder and the final full mailing (cover letter, postage-paid business reply return envelope and survey) were sent on January 26, and February 9, respectively.

 

Completed returns were accepted through March 8, 2006.   A total of 557 respondents completed the survey, resulting in a 47.2% response rate.  This response rate is down from a 53.8% response rate for the 2004-05 survey.  We believe that the decrease in response rate is due to the fact that the number of mailings for the 2005-06 survey differed from the 2004-05 wave.  The 2004-05 wave of the survey included three full mailings, while the 2005-06 wave included only two full mailings. 

 

An Overview: Survey Highlights 

 

Computer Use (questions 1-3)

 

§         In the 2006 survey, more faculty report owning a desktop computer than staff (85% vs. 77%).  Across the two groups, ownership of a desktop computer has decreased since 2005. 

§         Faculty respondents are much more likely to own a personal digital assistant than staff (40% compared to 21% in 2006), while staff are more likely to own a portable music/video player than faculty (24% compared to 15% in 2006). 

§         Both faculty and staff will most likely use desktop computers for email and web access.  While 82% of faculty respondents use a desktop computer for web access, only 70% of the overall sample uses a desktop computer for web access. 

§         Faculty ownership of laptop computers has increased from 75% in 2005 to 80% in 2006.  However, regular faculty usage of laptop computers at the UW has decreased from 67% in 2005 to 55% in 2006. 

§         Overall usage of laptop computers at the UW has decreased from 36% to 29% between 2005 and 2006. 

¨        Operating systems

§          Faculty respondents are more likely to use Macintosh than staff (33.9% vs. 13.7% in 2006). 

§          Usage of Macintosh has increased for faculty (26.4% in 2005 to 33.9% in 2006), while usage has decreased for staff (20.9% in 2005 to 13.7% in 2006).   

§          Windows NT/2000/XP remains the most popular operating system on campus for both faculty and staff. 

§          Windows NT/2000/XP seems to be more popular among staff than faculty (79% compared to 71% respectively). 

¨        Information technology products

§          It appears that staff are more likely to report using a desktop computer at the UW than faculty (96% vs. 88% in 2006).  

§          Personal digital assistant usage at the UW has decreased for both faculty and staff since 2005.  

 

Internet Use (questions 4-6)

¨        Internet Access

§          Faculty are more likely to report using commercial broadband to connect to the Internet when away from the UW than staff (74% vs. 52%). 

§          About 25% of staff report using the WiscWorld dial-in modem pool to connect to the Internet when off-campus, while only 17% of faculty report using this method. 

§          Faculty are more likely to report using a direct network connection to campus (14%) than staff (9%). 

¨        Satisfaction with service

§          Faculty and staff satisfaction with the performance of a direct network connection to campus has increased from an average rating of 3.2 (‘neither satisfied nor dissatisfied’) to a rating of 4.3 (‘somewhat satisfied) since 2005. 

§          Overall, both faculty and staff have noted a decrease in satisfaction with the WiscWorld dial-in modem pool.  Faculty rated this service a 4.2 in 2005 and a 3.1 in 2006.  Staff rated this service a 3.3 in 2005 and a 3.1 in 2006.

¨        Applications

§          There has been a decrease in the percentage of faculty reporting the use of instant messaging (AOL, Yahoo, MSN, etc.) since 2005 (19% in 2005 to 8% in 2006).  Staff usage of this application has remained steady. 

§          Faculty are more likely to report using podcasting or video podcasting applications than staff (8% vs. 4% in 2006). 

 

Computing Services and DoIT  (questions 7 & 8)

§         Both faculty and staff members report allocating the most resources toward purchasing technology goods and services.  The secondary choice for both faculty and staff was desktop support. 

§         The service awarded the lowest dollar amounts by both faculty and staff was web-based enhancements to My UW-Madison. 

§         Both faculty and staff respondents report a department or resident expert as the provider of choice for the categories of product information, demos, and recommendations, purchasing technology goods and services, post sales support (Help Desk), and desktop support (installations and repair).  

§         Staff respondents report a department or resident expert as the provider of choice for instructional technology support and training, while faculty report a UW school or college support unit as the provider of choice for these computing services. 

§         The DoIT Tech Store is the second choice for faculty respondents in the areas of product information, demos, and recommendations, purchasing technology goods and services, and post sales support (Help Desk).  The DoIT Tech Store is the second choice for staff for post sales support (Help Desk). 

 

Tech Store (question 9)

§         Staff respondents are more likely to be aware of Tech Store sales than faculty respondents (84% of staff vs. 74% of faculty). 

§         Awareness of DoIT-provided desktop support services and training services has increased among both faculty and staff respondents since 2005. 

 

Satisfaction with other services (questions 10-13)

¨        Awareness of Services

§          Faculty respondents are more likely than staff respondents to be aware of several services:  My UW-Madison (95% vs. 89%), Learn@UW (77% vs. 43%), My WebSpace (51% vs. 20%), and Bucky Backup (26% vs. 14%). 

§          Staff respondents are more likely than faculty respondents to be aware of the Digital Academic TV Network (32% vs. 12%) and WebSurvey@UW (27% vs. 22%).

§          Satisfaction with Learn@UW varies between faculty and staff, with faculty rating this service as ‘somewhat satisfied’ with the service, while staff rate this service as ‘neither satisfied nor dissatisfied.’ 

§          Satisfaction with training also differs between faculty and staff:  faculty respondents are ‘neither satisfied nor dissatisfied’ with training, while staff are ‘somewhat satisfied.’ 

                                                                                                                                                                                  

Wireless (questions 14 & 15)

§         A greater proportion of faculty respondents report using wireless ‘hot spots’ in the listed areas than staff respondents. 

§         Both faculty and staff respondents report using wireless ‘hot spots’ primarily at home (42% of faculty and 28% of staff).

§         Both faculty and staff are least likely to use ‘hot spots’ in classrooms (only 17% of faculty and 5% of staff use ‘hot spots’ in classrooms). 

§         For faculty, having more wireless hot spots on campus would be most likely to increase the likelihood of using wireless hot spots (42%).  For staff, having a laptop or other portable device would most likely increase the likelihood of using wireless hot spots (45%). 

§         The least likely choice for increasing the likelihood of using wireless hot spots for both faculty and staff would be additional outlets at key locations (3% of faculty and 5% of staff indicated that additional outlets would increase likelihood of using hot spots). 

 

Training (questions 16 & 17)

§         22% of faculty and 18% of staff respondents indicate that they plan to take computing skills training courses in the next year. 

 

Research Channel

§         The use of the Research Channel has increased for faculty since 2005 (from 4.9% to 8%). 

§         A greater proportion of staff respondents have never heard of the Research Channel, compared to faculty (90% of staff, 85% of faculty).  


2005-06 Faculty/Staff Computing Survey Data

PLEASE NOTE:  Respondents who skipped item 20 (‘What is your classification?’) were considered part of the ‘Other’ category (not included as faculty or staff).

 
 

 

 


Computer and Internet Use

1. Which of the following information technology products do you personally own?

 

As in the 2004-05 mail survey, faculty respondents are more likely to own a desktop computer than staff (approximately 85% of faculty and 77% of staff report desktop computer ownership).  Overall, the ownership of desktop computers has decreased since the time of the 2004-05 survey. 

 

There has been an increase in laptop ownership by faculty since 2005 (75% in 2005 to 80% in 2006), while staff ownership has remained the same (around 35%).

 

Cell/mobile phone ownership by staff has increased since 2005 (62% to 77%), while faculty ownership has remained consistent. 

 

Faculty are much more likely to own a personal digital assistant than staff (40% compared to 21% in 2006), while staff are more likely to own a portable music/video player than faculty (24% compared to 15% in 2006). 

 

Note:  A small number of respondents (approximately 3-7%) did not check either Yes or No to indicate ownership of the listed products.  We interpreted this as NOT owning the product.

 

                                                                     2004-2005 Survey                 2005-2006 Survey

 

Faculty

(n=102)

Staff

(n=469)

Total

(n=619)

Faculty

(n=65)

Staff

(n=417)

Total

(n=557)

Desktop computer

91%

81%

83%

85%

77%

76%

Laptop computer

75%

36%

43%

80%

36%

42%

Cellular/mobile phone

64%

62%

63%

65%

77%

74%

Personal digital assistant

51%

24%

28%

40%

21%

23%

Portable music/video player

--

--

--

15%

24%

23%

Portable storage device

56%

32%

37%

77%

33%

38%

Tablet PC

2%

0.9%

2%

0%

1%

0.4%

Wireless

handheld email device

2%

0.2%

1%

5%

1%

2%


2005-06 ONLY:  If you DO own the product, please indicate which activity/activities you use the product for.

 

 

Note:  Percentages noted are a % of the total for the specified classification, NOT just a % given by those who own the product.

A.  Desktop Computers

Both faculty and staff are using desktop computers for email and web access.  While 82% of faculty use a desktop computer for web access, only 70% of the overall sample uses a desktop computer for web access. 

                                                                                             2005-2006 Survey

 

Faculty

(n=65)

Staff

(n=417)

Total

(n=557)

Email

83%

70%

71%

Web Access

82%

69%

70%

Data Storage

69%

55%

55%

Address/Phone Numbers

34%

37%

36%

Data Collection

52%

34%

35%

Music

29%

36%

34%

Contact Information

35%

31%

30%

Calendar/Scheduling

31%

24%

24%

To Do Lists

23%

17%

17%

Quick Note-Taking

15%

11%

12%

Other*

19%

11%

12%

Phone Calls

8%

4%

4%

 

B.  Laptop Computer

A larger proportion of faculty report using a laptop computer for the various functions than staff.  For example, 68% of faculty report using a laptop computer for email, while only 31% of staff report using the laptop computer for this application.  This difference may be a result of the difference in sample size between the two groups and the fact that a larger proportion of faculty owns a laptop computer.

                                                       2005-2006 Survey

 

Faculty

(n=65)

Staff

(n=417)

Total

(n=557)

Email

68%

31%

36%

Web Access

68%

32%

36%

Data Storage

59%

25%

29%

Data Collection

52%

18%

22%

Address/Phone Numbers

34%

16%

18%

Contact Information

37%

15%

17%

Music

23%

16%

17%

Calendar/Scheduling

28%

13%

14%

To Do Lists

26%

11%

13%

Quick Note-Taking

25%

10%

12%

Other*

17%

7%

8%

Phone Calls

12%

2%

3%


C.  Cellular/Mobile phone

                                                                                              2005-2006 Survey

 

Faculty

(n=65)

Staff

(n=417)

Total

(n=557)

Phone Calls

54%

70%

66%

Address/Phone Numbers

31%

49%

47%

Contact Information

14%

28%

26%

Calendar/Scheduling

2%

6%

6%

Email

3%

3%

3%

Web Access

2%

4%

3%

To Do Lists

2%

3%

3%

Other*

0%

3%

3%

Quick Note-Taking

2%

2%

2%

Data Collection

3%

1%

1%

Music

2%

1%

1%

Data Storage

2%

1%

1%

 

D.  Personal Digital Assistant

A larger proportion of faculty report using a personal digital assistant for calendaring/scheduling and address/phone numbers (32% and 34% respectively) than staff (18% for each application). 

                                                                                            2005-2006 Survey

 

Faculty

(n=65)

Staff

(n=417)

Total

(n=557)

Address/Phone Numbers

34%

18%

20%

Calendar/Scheduling

32%

18%

19%

Contact Information

32%

15%

17%

To Do Lists

29%

13%

14%

Quick Note-Taking

29%

10%

12%

Email

8%

3%

3%

Data Storage

8%

2%

3%

Data Collection

5%

2%

2%

Web Access

6%

1%

2%

Phone Calls

3%

1%

2%

Music

5%

1%

1%

Other*

0%

1%

1%

 


E.  Portable music/video player

                                                                                              2005-2006 Survey

 

Faculty

(n=65)

Staff

(n=417)

Total

(n=557)

Music

14%

23%

22%

Data Storage

6%

4%

5%

Calendar/Scheduling

1.5%

1%

1%

Address/Phone Numbers

2%

2%

1%

Contact Information

0%

1%

1%

Data Collection

0%

1%

1%

To Do Lists

0%

1%

1%

Other*

0%

1%

1%

Quick Note-Taking

0%

1%

0.4%

Email

0%

0.2%

0.2%

Web Access

0%

0

0%

Phone Calls

0%

0

0%

 

F.  Portable storage device

                                                                                            2005-2006 Survey

 

Faculty

(n=65)

Staff

(n=417)

Total

(n=557)

Data Storage

66%

29%

34%

Data Collection

17%

9%

10%

Music

0%

3%

3%

Other*

8%

2%

3%

Quick Note-Taking

3%

1%

2%

Address/Phone Numbers

0%

1%

1%

Contact Information

2%

1%

1%

To Do Lists

0%

1%

1%

Calendar/Scheduling

0%

0.2%

0.4%

Email

0%

0

0.4%

Web Access

0%

0.2%

0.4%

Phone Calls

0%

0

0.2%

 


G.  Tablet PC

Only a very small proportion of Staff report using a Tablet PC for any of the listed applications.

                                                                                            2005-2006 Survey

 

Faculty

(n=65)

Staff

(n=417)

Total

(n=557)

Calendar/Scheduling

0%

0.2%

0.2%

Address/Phone Numbers

0%

0.2%

0.2%

Quick Note-Taking

0%

0.2%

0.2%

Contact Information

0%

0.2%

0.2%

Email

0%

0.2%

0.2%

Data Collection

0%

0.2%

0.2%

Web Access

0%

0.2%

0.2%

Phone Calls

0%

0.2%

0.2%

To Do Lists

0%

0.2%

0.2%

Music

0%

0.2%

0.2%

Data Storage

0%

0.2%

0.2%

Other*

0%

0.2%

0.2%

 

H.  Wireless handheld device

Very few faculty and staff respondents use wireless handheld devices.

                                                                                            2005-2006 Survey

 

Faculty

(n=65)

Staff

(n=417)

Total

(n=557)

Calendar/Scheduling

3%

1%

1%

Address/Phone Numbers

3%

1%

1%

Quick Note-Taking

3%

1%

1%

Contact Information

3%

0.7%

1%

Email

3%

0.7%

1%

Data Collection

2%

0.2%

0.4%

Web Access

3%

0.7%

1%

Phone Calls

3%

0.7%

1%

To Do Lists

2%

1%

1%

Music

2%

0.5%

0.5%

Data Storage

1%

0.5%

0.5%

Other*

0%

0.2%

0.2%

 

* See Appendix I for open-ended responses given for the ‘Other’ category for items q1a@12, q1b@12, q1c@12 and q1d@12.


2. Which operating systems do you use on the computer(s) you own?

 

Usage of Windows-based operating systems continues to remain popular among both faculty and staff.  Faculty are more likely to use Macintosh than staff (33.9% vs. 13.7% in 2006).  Usage of Macintosh has increased for faculty (26.4% in 2005 to 33.9% in 2006), while usage has decreased for staff (20.9% in 2005 to 13.7% in 2006).    

           

                                                             2004-2005 Mail Survey              2005-2006 Mail Survey

 

Faculty

(n=102)

Staff

(n=469)

Total

(n=619)

Faculty

(n=65)

Staff

(n=417)

Total

(n=557)

Windows NT/2000/XP

67%

57%

59%

61.5%

63%

62%

Windows 98/ME

17%

23%

22%

10.8%

19%

19%

 

 

Mac

 

 

 

26.4%

 

OSx=22.5%

V9.x=3.9 %

 

20.9%

 

OSx=14.5%

V9.x=6.4 %

 

22%

 

OSx=16%%

V9.x=6 %

 

33.9%

 

OSx=27.7%

V9.x=6.2%

 

13.7%

 

OSx=9.1%%

V9.x=4.6%%

 

16%

 

OSx=11.3%

V9.x=4.7%

Linux

2%

3%

3%

6%

3%

3%

Other *

0%

2%

2%

0%

2%

2%

UNIX

0%

0.6%

1%

2%

1%

1%

I don’t know

2%

2%

2%

2%

1%

1%

 

2a. Which operating systems do you use on the computer(s) you use at the UW?

 

Windows NT/2000/XP remains the most popular operating system on campus for both faculty and staff.  Windows NT/2000/XP seems to be more popular among staff than faculty (79% to 71% respectively).  LINUX and UNIX seem to be more popular among faculty than staff in 2006, but their usage is still low compared to Macintosh or Windows usage. 

                                                             

                                                                2004-2005 Mail Survey         2005-2006 Mail Survey

 

Faculty

Staff

Total

Faculty

Staff

Total

Windows NT/2000/XP

71%

77%

75%

71%

79%

79%

 

 

Mac

 

 

 

20%

 

OSx=16.7

V9.x=2.9%

 

20%

 

OSx=13.4%

V9.x=7.0%

 

20%

 

OSx=13%

V9.x=7%

 

29.3%

 

OSx=26.2%

V9.x=3.1%

 

21%

 

OSx=14.6%

V9.x=6.5%

 

21%

 

OSx=15.1%

V9.x=5.9%

Windows 98/ME

12%

9%

10%

3%

7%

7%

Linux

7%

6%

6%

5%

4.3%

4%

I don’t know

2%

4%

4%

0%

4.3%

4%

UNIX

4%

6%

6%

5%

3.8%

3%

Other *

0

3%

3%

0%

2.6%

2%

 

*See Appendix I for open-ended responses given for the ‘Other’ category for items q2MY@h and q2UW@h.
3.   Which of the following information technology products do you regularly use                        at the UW?

 

Desktop computers have remained the most regularly used information technology product at the UW for both faculty and staff.  It appears that staff are more likely to report using a desktop computer than faculty (96% vs. 88% in 2006).   Personal digital assistant usage at the UW has decreased for both faculty and staff since 2005.   Faculty are more likely to report using a portable storage device at the UW than staff (40% vs. 21% in 2006). 

  

                                                                 2004-2005 Mail Survey         2005-2006 Mail Survey

 

Faculty

(n=102)

Staff

(n=469)

Total

(n=619)

Faculty

(n=65)

Staff

(n=417)

Total

(n=557)

Desktop computer

85%

97%

94%

88%

96%

94%

Laptop computer

67%

29%

36%

55%

26%

29%

Portable storage device

28%

16%

18%

40%

21%

22%

Cellular/mobile phone

40%

20%

24%

29%

19%

20%

Personal digital assistant

43%

18%

22%

32%

15%

17%

Portable music/video player

--

--

--

6%

5%

5%

Wireless

handheld email device

1%

0.2%

0.3%

2%

1%

1.5%

None of these products

1%

0.9%

1%

3%

2%

1.5%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Internet Use

 

4.  When you are at home or off-campus, how do you access the Internet?

 

Commercial broadband (DSL or cable modem) is the most popular way to connect to the Internet off-campus for both faculty and staff.  Faculty are more likely to report using Commercial Broadband than staff (74% vs. 52%).  About 25% of staff report using the WiscWorld dial-in modem pool to connect to the Internet, while only 17% of faculty report using this method off-campus.  Faculty are more likely to report using a direct network connection to campus (14%) than staff (9%). 

 

                                                                                                     2005-2006 Survey

 

Faculty

(n=65)

Staff

(n=417)

Total

(n=557)

Commercial Broadband (DSL or cable modem)

74%

52%

54%

WiscWorld dial-in modem pool

17%

25%

23%

Wireless

35%

21%

22%

Dial-in Modem using a commercial Internet service provider (e.g., AOL, TDS, etc.)

8%

13%

14%

Direct network connection to campus

14%

9%

10%

I do not connect to the Internet at home

3%

10%

9%

Other (specify)*

2%

2%

2%

I don’t know

0%

0.5%

0.5%

 

*See Appendix I for open-ended responses for the ‘Other’ category for item q4@h.

 

 

 

 

 


5. Overall, how satisfied are you with the performance of [insert each applicable Internet mode from q4]? (1 = Very dissatisfied, 5 = Very satisfied)

 

Faculty and staff satisfaction with the performance of a direct network connection to campus has increased from an average rating of 3.2 (‘neither satisfied nor dissatisfied’) to a rating of 4.3 (‘somewhat satisfied) since 2005.  

 

Faculty satisfaction with a dial-in modem using a commercial Internet Service Provider has decreased from a rating of 4.1 (‘somewhat satisfied’) in 2005 to 3.1 (‘neither satisfied nor dissatisfied’) in 2006.  However, it is important to consider the effects of sample size when noting this difference (39 respondents in 2005 vs. 7 respondents in 2006). 

 

Overall, both faculty and staff have noted a decrease in satisfaction with the WiscWorld dial-in modem pool.  Faculty rated this service a 4.2 in 2005 and a 3.1 in 2006.  Staff rated this service a 3.3 in 2005 and a 3.1 in 2006.

 

In 2006, faculty respondents rate satisfaction with wireless on campus as 2.9, while staff rate satisfaction with this service as 4.0.   The faculty rating for the wireless on campus service has decreased since 2005, from 3.7 to 2.9.  It is important to note the small sample size of faculty responding to this item when interpreting the results.

 

                                                                 2004-2005 Mail Survey       2005-2006 Mail Survey

 

Faculty

(n=102)

Staff

(n=469)

Total

(n=619)

Faculty

(n=65)

Staff

(n=417)

Total

(n=557)

Direct network connection to campus

3.7

(n=16)

3.9

(n=70)

3.9 (n=93)

4.3 (n=44)

4.3

(n=207)

4.3 (n=293)

Commercial broadband (DSL or cable modem)

--

--

--

4.1

(n=51)

4.1

(n=222)

4.1 (n=312)

Dial-in modem using a commercial Internet Service Provider

3.1

(n=13)

3.00

(n=80)

3.0 (n=100)

3.1

(n=7)

3.1

(n=61)

3.1 (n=82)

Wireless on campus

3.7

(n=27)

4.0

(n=59)

3.9 (n=95)

2.9

(n=17)

4.0

(n=78)

3.8 (n=114)

WiscWorld dial-in modem pool

3.2

(n=49)

3.3

(n=182)

3.3 (n=242)

3.1

(n=14)

3.1

(n=121)

3.2 (n=149)

Other (please specify)*

3.0

(n=3)

4.0

(n=10)

3.4 (n=13)

4.0

(n=1)

3.3

(n=8)

3.4 (n=11)

 

*See Appendix I for specified responses to the ‘Other’ category for item q5@f.

 


6. Which of these Internet applications do you use?

 

There has been a decline in the percentage of faculty who use video conferencing applications since 2005 (12% vs. 9.2%).   Staff usage of video conferencing applications has slightly increased from 8% in 2005 to approximately 10% in 2006.

 

More faculty have reported using streaming music or video applications in 2006 (34%) than in 2005 (28%).   Staff usage of this application has remained consistent.

 

There has been a decrease in the percentage of faculty reporting the use of instant messaging (AOL, Yahoo, MSN, etc.) since 2005 (19% in 2005 to 8% in 2006).  Staff usage of this application has remained steady. 

 

Faculty are more likely to report using podcasting or video podcasting applications than staff in 2006 (8% vs. 4%). 

                                                                2004-2005 Mail Survey        2005-2006 Mail Survey

 

Faculty

(n=102)

Staff

(n=469)

Total

(n=619)

Faculty

(n=65)

Staff

(n=417)

Total

(n=557)

I do not use any of these Internet applications

46%

35%

37%

48%

47%

45%

Streaming music or video

28%

33%

35%

34%

34%

36%

Instant messaging (e.g., AOL, Yahoo, MSN, etc.)

19%

24%

26%

8%

23%

22%

Peer-to-peer file sharing

16%

17%

18%

19%

19%

19%

Video conferencing (scheduled event, larger audience)

12%

8%

9%

9%

10%

9%

Desktop video conferencing (one-to-one with workstation camera) 

7%

3%

4%

8%

4%

5%

Podcasting or video podcasting

--

--

--

7%

4%

4%

                                                                                   

 


Computing services and DoIT

 

7. Below is a list of factors that can describe the experience of owning or operating computers and other information technology. Assuming you were in charge of allocating resources for the campus, how would you distribute 100 dollars (‘points’ for previous versions) among the following services? If you don’t want to allocate any dollars to an area, just write “0.”**

 

The greatest number of dollars was allocated toward purchasing technology goods and services for both faculty and staff.  The secondary choice for both faculty and staff was desktop support.  The service awarded the lowest dollar amounts by both faculty and staff was web-based enhancements to My UW-Madison. 

 

Faculty respondents appear to value post sales support (Help Desk) and instructional technology support more highly than staff.  Respondents in the staff category report a higher average dollar allocation toward training than those in the faculty category.   

 

                                                                                                         

 


Question 7, continued.

 

Preference Among Services

                                                                           2005-2006 Mail Survey

Computing Service

Faculty

Staff

Total

Purchasing technology goods and services

$22.65

(n=51)

$22.74

(n=337)

$22.72

(n=443)

Desktop support (at your location)

$18.09

(n=53)

$17.73

(n=342)

$18.17

(n=454)

Training

$10.52

(n=50)

$14.74

(n=337)

$14.50

(n=444)

Post sales support (Help Desk)

$17.33

(n=51)

$12.46

(n=330)

$13.26

(n=432)

Instructional technology support

$15.72

(n=54)

$12.69

(n=319)

$12.98

(n=428)

Desktop Support (at DoIT’s location)

$8.38

(n=49)

$10.30

(n=314)

$9.92

(n=418)

Web-based enhancements to My UW-Madison

$7.48

(n=44)

$8.73

(n=308)

$8.61

(n=403)

Product information, demos, and recommendations

$9.76

(n=50)

$8.07

(n=316)

$8.34

(n=415)

 

**In 24 cases where the respondent volunteered an allocation, the total did not equal $100. 


8. Thinking about your computing and information technology needs, circle the number that corresponds to the one provider you are most likely to choose for each service using the scale below.

 

1 = Myself

2 = Friend/relative

3 = DoIT Tech Store Showroom

4 = Department or resident expert

5 = Large chain store or retailer (e.g., Best Buy, CompUSA, American TV, etc.)

6 = Web/mail order sources (e.g., Dell, Apple, Newegg.com, etc.)

7 = UW school or college support units

8 = None of the providers listed

 

Both faculty and staff respondents report a department or resident expert as the provider of choice for the categories of product information, demos, and recommendations, purchasing technology goods and services, post sales support (Help Desk) and desktop support (installations and repair).   Staff respondents also report a department or resident expert as the provider of choice for instructional technology support and training, while faculty report a UW school or college support unit as the provider of choice for these computing services. 

 

There is a larger variation among responses for the second choice of provider between faculty and staff respondents for the various computing services.   The DoIT Tech Store is the second choice for faculty respondents in the areas of product information, demos, and recommendations, purchasing technology goods and services, and post sales support (Help Desk).  The DoIT Tech Store is the second choice for staff for post sales support (Help Desk). 

 

2006 Mail Respondents’ Provider Preference

TOP CHOICE

Computing Service

Faculty

Staff

Total

Product information, demos, and recommendations

Department or resident expert (29%)

Department or resident expert (25%)

Department or resident expert (26%)

Purchasing technology, goods and services

Department or resident expert (28%)

Department or resident expert (20%)

Department or resident expert (22%)

Post sales support (Help Desk)

Department or resident expert (39%)

Department or resident expert (33%)

Department or resident expert (32%)

Desktop support (installations and repair)

Department or resident expert (52%)

Department or resident expert (40%)

Department or resident expert (41%)

Instructional technology support

UW school or college support units (34%)

Department or resident expert (32%)

Department or resident expert (30%)

Training

UW school or college support units (32%)

Department or resident expert (26%)

Department or resident expert (25%)

 


SECOND CHOICE

Computing Service

Faculty

Staff

Total

Product information, demos, and recommendations

DoIT Tech Store Showroom (20%)

Friend/Relative

(19%)

Friend/Relative

(18%)

Purchasing technology goods and services

DoIT Tech Store Showroom (23%)

Web/Mail order services (19.7%)

Web/Mail order services (20%)

Post sales support (Help Desk)

DoIT Tech Store Showroom (23%)

DoIT Tech Store Showroom (15%)

DoIT Tech Store Showroom (15%)

Desktop support (installations and repair)

UW school or college support units (17%)

UW school or college support units (13%)

UW school or college support units (14%)

Instructional technology support

Department or resident expert (25%)

UW school or college support units (20%)

UW school or college support units (22%)

Training

Myself

 (19%)

School or college support units (18%)

UW school or college support units (20%)

 

 

 

 


Tech Store

9. Which of the following DoIT-provided services are you aware of? [Check all that apply]

 

Awareness of DoIT-provided desktop support services has increased among both faculty and Staff respondents since 2005.  In 2005, 50% of faculty and 57% of staff reported being aware of desktop support services, while in 2006, 68% of faculty and 74% of staff reported awareness.

 

Awareness of DoIT-provided training services has also increased among both faculty and staff respondents since 2005.  In 2005, 40% of faculty and 58% of staff reported being aware of desktop support services, while in 2006, 68% of faculty and 80% of staff reported awareness of training services provided by DoIT.

 

Staff respondents are more likely to be aware of Tech Store sales than faculty respondents (84% of staff vs. 74% of faculty). 

 

Note:  The categories changed significantly for the Jan 2006 version of the questionnaire.  See previous versions for longer list of categories.

 

Awareness of Service

 

                                                                 2004-2005 Mail Survey       2005-2006 Mail Survey

 

Faculty

(n=102)

Staff

(n=469)

Total

(n=619)

Faculty

(n=65)

Staff

(n=417)

Total

(n=557)

Tech Store Showroom (Product info, demos, and recommendations)

80%

81%

79%

77%

81%

77%

Tech Store Sales

**

**

**

74%

84%

80%

Help Desk (Help Online, walk-in, or phone)

***

***

***

88%

89%

87%

Desktop Support (Installation and repair)

50%

57%

54%

68%

74%

71%

Training

40%

58%

53%

68%

80%

76%

 

**Tech Store Sales were separated into three categories in these surveys:  online catalog, walk-in, and telephone)

***Help Desk was separated into three categories in these surveys:  phone, web, and walk-in area at DoIT.


9a. How many times have you used the following DoIT-provided services in the past six months? [Check all that apply]

 

The percentage of faculty respondents who report using the Tech Store Showroom (in the past six months) has increased from 35% in 2005 to 48% in 2006.  The percentage of faculty respondents who report using DoIT-provided training has also increased from 7% in 2005 to 12% in 2006.  The percentage of staff respondents who report using DoIT-provided desktop support services (in the past six months) has increased from 10% in 2005 to 16% in 2006.  In addition, usage of DoIT-provided training has increased from 7% in 2005 to 12% in 2006. 

 

Approximately 52% of faculty respondents report using Tech Store sales, while only 32% of staff report using this DoIT-provided service in the past six months. 

 

2004-2005 Mail Survey

 

Faculty

Used

 

Faculty

Mean

Frequency

Staff

Used

Staff

Mean

frequency

Total

Used

Total

Mean Frequency

Tech Store Showroom (Product info, demos, and recommendations)

35%

2.0

28%

2.6

28%

2.4

Tech Store Sales

**

**

**

**

**

**

Help Desk (Help Online, walk-in, or phone)

***

***

***

***

***

***

Desktop Support (Installation and repair)

12%

2.2

10%

3.1

10%

2.9

Training

7%

1.9

7%

2.0

7%

2.0

 

2005-2006 Mail Survey

 

Faculty

Used

 

Faculty

Mean

Frequency

Staff

Used

Staff

Mean

frequency

Total

Used

Total

Mean Frequency

Tech Store Showroom (Product info, demos, and recommendations)

48%

1.74

26%

1.7

29%

1.7

Tech Store Sales

52%

2.00

32%

2.7

33%

2.5

Help Desk (Help Online, walk-in, or phone)

51%

3.33

52%

3.0

51%

3.0

Desktop Support (Installation and repair)

12%

2.13

16%

3.6

16%

3.4

Training

12%

1.75

12%

1.6

12%

1.6

 

The percentages listed for usage of the service in the past six months take into account respondents that wrote in an actual number.            

 

**Tech Store Sales were separated into three categories in these surveys:  online catalog, walk-in, and telephone)

***Help Desk was separated into three categories in these surveys:  phone, web, and walk-in area at DoIT.


10. Using the scale provided, please check if you are aware of the following services and indicate how often you typically use them.   If you have not used a service, circle 4 = Not used.

 

Faculty respondents are more likely than staff respondents to be aware of several services:  My UW-Madison (95% vs. 89%), Learn@UW (77% vs. 43%), My WebSpace (51% vs. 20%), and Bucky Backup (26% vs. 14%).

 

On the other hand, staff respondents are more likely than faculty respondents to be aware of the Digital Academic TV Network (32% vs. 12%) and WebSurvey@UW (27% vs. 22%). 

 

Note:  There were a handful of cases where the respondent did not indicate whether or not he/she was aware of the service, and indicated “Not Used” for the usage items.  We felt that we could not assume that the respondent was aware of the service.  Thus, the awareness measures reported reflect only those respondents who indicated being aware of and/or using the service. 

 

Awareness of Service

 

         2005-2006 Mail Survey

 

 

Faculty

(n=65)

Staff

(n=417)

Total

(n=557)

WiscMail (University email ending in @wisc.edu, etc.)

94%

96%

95%

My UW-Madison (Web portal)

95%

89%

89%

WiscCal (Calendar and scheduling)

82%

80%

79%

Learn@UW

77%

43%

47%

My WebSpace

51%

20%

43%

WebSurvey@UW

22%

27%

29%

Bucky Backup

26%

14%

26%

Digital Academic TV Network (DATN)

12%

32%

19%

 


10a. Use of Service

Note: An assumption was made that non-response for use of service = Not Used.

 

Approximately 80% of faculty respondents and 73% of staff respondents report using WiscMail on a daily basis. 

 

42% of faculty respondents report using My UW-Madison on a daily basis, while only 16% of staff use this service daily.  Only 5% of faculty respondents report not using the My UW-Madison web portal, while 30% of staff report not using My UW. 

 

A much higher usage of Learn@UW is reported by faculty respondents than staff respondents.  Only 58% of faculty respondents report not using Learn@UW, while 90% of staff respondents report not using this service. 

 

2005-2006 Mail Survey FACULTY

 

Daily

Weekly

Monthly

Not Used

WiscMail (University email ending in @wisc.edu, etc.)

80%

3%

5%

12%

My UW-Madison (Web portal)

42%

34%

19%

5%

WiscCal (Calendar and scheduling)

8%

3%

6%

83%

Learn@UW

15%

5%

22%

58%

My WebSpace

0%

3%

9%

88%

WebSurvey@UW

0%

0%

5%

95%

Bucky Backup

3%

8%

0%

89%

Digital Academic TV Network (DATN)

0%

2%

0%

98%

 

2005 – 2006 Mail Survey STAFF

 

Daily

Weekly

Monthly

Not Used

WiscMail (University email ending in @wisc.edu, etc.)

73%

5%

6%

16%

My UW-Madison (Web portal)

16%

23%

31%

30%

WiscCal (Calendar and scheduling)

14%

5%

6%

75%

Learn@UW

2%

2%

6%

90%

My WebSpace

1%

2%

8%

89%

WebSurvey@UW

0.2%

0.2%

5%

95%

Bucky Backup

3%

2%

1%

94%

Digital Academic TV Network (DATN)

1%

1%

4%

94%

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

2005 – 2006 Mail Survey TOTAL

 

Daily

Weekly

Monthly

Not Used

WiscMail (University email ending in @wisc.edu, etc.)

74%

5%

6%

15%

My UW-Madison (Web portal)

20%

24%

28%

28%

WiscCal (Calendar and scheduling)

13%

5%

6%

76%

Learn@UW

5%

2%

8%

85%

My WebSpace

1%

2%

8%

89%

WebSurvey@UW

0.4%

0.2%

5%

93%

Bucky Backup

3%

3%

0.4%

94%

Digital Academic TV Network (DATN)

0.4%

1%

4%

95%


11. Using the scale provided, please rate your satisfaction with these DoIT services. If you have not had experience with a particular area, circle N = Not applicable.

 

Review of changes in satisfaction between January of 2005 and January of 2005 seems to show a very small increase in satisfaction with the Tech Store Showroom, desktop support, WiscCal, WiscMail, and My UW-Madison overall.

 

Satisfaction with Learn@UW varies between faculty and staff, with faculty rating this service as ‘somewhat satisfied’ while staff respondents rate this service as ‘neither satisfied nor dissatisfied.’  Satisfaction with training also differs between faculty and staff, as faculty respondents are ‘neither satisfied nor dissatisfied’ with training, while staff are ‘somewhat satisfied.’ 

 

1 = Very dissatisfied

2 = Somewhat dissatisfied

3 = Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

4 = Somewhat satisfied

5 = Very satisfied

Mean Satisfaction Ratings

 

                                                               2004-2005 Mail Survey              2005-2006 Mail Survey

 

Faculty

Staff

Total

Faculty

Staff

Total

Tech Store Showroom (Product info, demos, and recommendations)

3.8

(n=56)

3.8

(n=220)

3.8 (n=291)

4.0

(n=43)

3.8

(n=226)

3.9 (n=302)

Tech Store sales (Online catalog, walk-in, or phone)

*

*

*

4.1

(n=49)

4.0

(n=253)

4.0 (n=338)

Help Desk (Help Online, walk-in or phone)

**

**

**

4.3

(n=48)

4.0

(n=320)

4.1 (n=417)

Desktop Support (Installation and repair)

3.7

(n=26)

3.7

(n=117)

3.7 (n=151)

3.6

(n=20)

4.0

(n=142)

4.0 (n=185)

WiscCal (Calendar and scheduling)

3.2

(n=17)

3.6

(n=132)

3.5 (n=156)

3.3

(n=16)

3.6

(n=134)

3.6 (n=176)

WiscMail (University email ending in @wisc.edu, etc.)

4.1

(n=75)

4.1

(n=384)

4.1 (n=492)

4.4

(n=56)

4.2

(n=340)

4.2 (n=458)

My UW-Madison (Web Portal)

3.8

(n=68)

4.0

(n=272)

3.9 (n=361)

4.2

(n=53)

4.0

(n=277)

4.0 (n=379)

Bucky Backup (data backup service)

3.8

(n=4)

3.9

(n=44)

3.8 (n=51)

3.3

(n=10)

3.6

(n=44)

3.6 (n=57)

Learn@UW

--

--

--

3.9

(n=24)

3.3

(n=50)

3.5 (n=91)

WebSurvey@UW

--

--

--

3.8

(n=4)

3.5

(n=39)

3.6 (n=49)

My WebSpace

--

--

--

3.3

(n=8)

3.7

(n=60)

3.7 (n=79)

Training

--

--

--

3.2

(n=16)

3.9

(n=126)

3.8 (n=163)

Digital Academic TV Network (DATN)

--

--

--

3.0

(n=2)

3.6

(n=34)

3.5 (n=43)

*Tech Store Sales were separated into three categories in these surveys

**Help Desk was separated into three categories in these surveys

 

 

 

 

12.  We are very interested in continuing to improve services offered by DoIT, and receiving feedback enables us to do so.  Please feel free to use the space below to comment on your experiences with DoIT products or services. 

 

See Appendix I for complete list of open-ended responses volunteered by respondents.

 


13. Thinking about your most recent DoIT purchase, please rate your satisfaction with each of the areas listed below.  If you have no experience with a particular area, circle N=Not Applicable.

Note:  The options for respondent to qualify whether they have made a purchase ever, more than six months ago, or within the last six months were not in the 2004-2005 survey.

 

A greater proportion of faculty respondents (49%) have made a DoIT purchase in the past six months than staff respondents (31%).

Purchase Behavior

                                                                                             2005-2006 Survey

 

Faculty

(n=65)

Staff

(n=417)

Total

(n=557)

Never made a DoIT purchase

17%